Insight: The controversial Brabham BT46B. [Archive] - Racerplanet Network Forums

View Full Version : Insight: The controversial Brabham BT46B.


08-20-2002, 06:13 AM
You've probably heard about the old Brabham F1 "fan-car", and wondered why it caused so much controversy, or what the fan did on this remarkable car.

I'll explained. First, we need to understand the principles of aerodynamics. The idea on a modern racing car is to have a low pressure area underneath the car, which produces downforce. The way to achieve this is to have less downforce, underneath the car, and make use of things like venturi tunnels, and spitters, to help expell air from under the car.

The Chapparal-Chevrolet sportscars where the first to start investigating ground effects principles. Designer Jim Hall helped to design a car with venturi tunnels at the front, and back. While, this had big downforce at the back, the only thing keeping the front down was the weight of the engine.. This was countered by putting a big air-dam at the front of the car. This caused the opposite problem. The car had such huge downforce, that the front wheels ground their way through the bodywork! The idea was eventually put aside, as it was not fully understood.

http://www.vicelford.com/gallery/23large.jpg

Eventually, twin fans were tried on the very strange Chapparal 2J sports car, seen above. These fans were designed to pull air out from underneath the car, which would have the effect of creating more downforce, and pulling the car down onto the road.

The idea worked, very well. So well, that it was hurriedly banned!

Before long, Gordon Murray and David North had adopted it for use on the Brabham BT46B F1 "fan-car". Officially, the fan was only used to cool the Alfa Romeo flat-12 engine, which rapidly overheated.

http://www.forix.com/iex/imgz/1978/08001_8W.JPG

The fans supposedly pulled air across the engine, which kept it cool. But, while they pulled air across the engine, the car had venturi tunnels underneath it (designing these was complex, since the Alfa flat-12 engine was very wide), and, the fan also pulled a huge amount of air from under the car. The fan was driven via a complex network of shafts and clutches from the gearbox. The clutches were used to prevent the fan over-driving the gearbox on gearchanges. It wasn't perfect, however. The original plastic fans disintegrated under testing, so glass fibre versions were employed, and then later, magnesium versions were used.

http://8w.forix.com/thething.jpg

The technical problems involved were huge. The whole engine bay was sealed (as shown above), so that air couldn't be drawn through the engine and break the low pressure area beneath the car. Flexible skirts were developed which extended to the road surface, as well as extending back and around the suspension arms. A thermodynamics expert, David Cox, was even employed to work out the number of fan blades, pitch and optimum rotation speed!


Even while the car was at a stand-still, when the engine was revved up, it could be seen to suddenly squat downwards, towards the ground. Flexible rubber skirts were used around the edges of the car, to seal this low pressure region under the car, as well! The front one intially began to wear away, but, once skid was installed on the bottom of the skirt, their were no more problems.

http://www2.zr.ru/friends/f1/Pict/staty/brabhambt46.jpg
http://www2.zr.ru/friends/f1/Pict/staty/m-brbt46b3.jpg

This had rival teams screaming, and very outraged and upset. (Because the use of moving parts for aerodynamic, or downforce benefit was strictly outlawed). Gordon Murray countered that the fans primary purpose was to cool the engine, and any aerodynamic benefits were completely unplanned, and co-incidental. ^_^ This approach was declared legal by the FIA, but, the car would only have a short racing life.

Contrary to popular belief, Bernie Ecclestone, the then boss of the Brabham team, quietly withdrew the car after only 1 race, after all the protests and outrage. In that race, another car dropped oil on the track, through a turn. All the other cars had to slow down for that turn, but the Brabham could speed through, unaffected! A truly remarkable car. It still exists, and holds the record time for the Goodwood hillclimb, I believe.

Justin Martin
08-20-2002, 07:10 AM
Very good article Chris. -^ I wonder if anyone (outside of Brabham) know how much downforce the car produced?

08-20-2002, 07:37 AM
I'm not sure how much downforce it did have, only that the BT46B was well and truly SUPERGLUED to the ground.

The fact that it would suddenly squat down, when the engine was revved up, whilst the car was stationary, should give you an idea of the gigantic downforce levels.. ;)

FDA
08-20-2002, 02:34 PM
Originally posted by IH8COPS
Very good article Chris. -^ I wonder if anyone (outside of Brabham) know how much downforce the car produced?

I know it was often said of the Chapparal -- apparently accurately -- that it would stick to the ceiling if the fans were on.

Justin Martin
08-20-2002, 02:40 PM
Heh, so that means that the Chapparel's fan system was producing at least 2000lbs of downforce when stationary, that's about what a modern F1 car does at speed, isn't it?

Radical-Al
08-20-2002, 03:42 PM
the fans were powered on the Chaparral 2J by a Snowmobile engine, 2 stroke I think. Only car to be of competition to the McLaren's...

08-20-2002, 10:53 PM
Radic-AL: Including of course the Porsche 917/30s, which frequently beat the Mclarens via brute power (1500+hp) and torque (1700+Nm) (and huge downforce levels which could be used, because of the massive power).

Apparently the 917/30 was so effective, the Mclaren pulled out of Can-Am, totally devastated by the Porsche assault. But the Porsche would soon be banned, as well, outed by a fuel economy rule.. The 917/30's 85 litres per 100km was outside the new limits put in place.

TopGear
08-21-2002, 08:49 AM
:'(

Don't you just hate when they change the rules suddenly just to get a car out of the series?

FDA
08-21-2002, 07:23 PM
Originally posted by chris
Radic-AL: Including of course the Porsche 917/30s, which frequently beat the Mclarens via brute power (1500+hp) and torque (1700+Nm) (and huge downforce levels which could be used, because of the massive power).

Apparently the 917/30 was so effective, the Mclaren pulled out of Can-Am, totally devastated by the Porsche assault. But the Porsche would soon be banned, as well, outed by a fuel economy rule.. The 917/30's 85 litres per 100km was outside the new limits put in place.

The McLaren's ruled for some time, always being somewhere around a half sec faster in qualifying; in fact their nearest competition was the year-old McLarens which had been sold. This was a pretty amazing feat, since the cars all used the same basic engines (big aluminum Chevies) until the Porsches came along. (The Mark Donahue book "The Unfair Advantage", has a real interesting account of working with Prosche to make these cars the Can-Am force they were.)

Before the Porsches arrived, tho, the Chaparral 2J though, was an astonishingly fast car which would put the McLarens a half sec or more back on the grid. I saw the Riverside race on TV and the Chaparral would simply pull up behind one of the McLarens and drive around it like you might drive around a pylon (saw a great overhead shot of that). The downforce must have been tremendous. The fan engines, which were modified snowmobile 2-strokes, were unreliable (I always wondered what they might have done if they'd just grabbed a small Honda motor for those fans). The 2J, as far as I remember, never finsihed a race.

08-21-2002, 08:11 PM
I believe the "pontoon-nose" March had a 9.1 litre Chevrolet small-block V8, with 2 valve technology. Talk about a monstrous engine.. :eek:

And then their was the planned Porsche 917PA with a FLAT-16, yes, a flat-16 :eek: engine. Apparently the flat-16 was very long, quite heavy, and the car had poor handling. That car still exists, in the Porsche museum in Stuttgart-Zuffenhausen, with flat-16 engine.

Donohue reckoned you could hear one end of the flat-16 engine start up before the other.. :rolleyes: The 917PA project was abandoned, in favour of turbocharged flat-12 variations of the 917.

the Chaparral would simply pull up behind one of the McLarens and drive around it like you might drive around a pylon (saw a great overhead shot of that).

Yes, that's quite amazing performance. Especially considering the fact that the Chapparal was a front engined car, too, I believe..

The modern Mclaren F1 supercar uses twin fans as well (fan assisted boundary control, they call it). No co-incidence, since it was also designed by Gordon Murray. The Mclaren also has excellent high speed stability, too, which is probably something to do with the fans.

FDA
08-21-2002, 10:38 PM
Originally posted by chris

Yes, that's quite amazing performance. Especially considering the fact that the Chapparal was a front engined car, too, I believe..


No, except for the Chaparral 1, all were mid-engined cars (with semi-automatic gearboxes). Some pictures of it from Goodwood http://www.mgussin.freeuk.com/1-32GoodwoodFOS1997-1.htm

I read the claim online that the 2J would pull 1.7 g's, which at the time was an incredible amount more than any cars; just how much you can surmise from these from Vic Elford, who drove the 2J (the site is http://www.ashcom.homestead.com/Elford2J.html):

Vic Elford: "I was just trying to remember the first time I drove the Chaparral 2J and I recall it was at Rattlesnake Raceway, Jim Hall's private track. He got me down there for a couple of days to get the feel for it because it was 'different' to drive. The first time I raced it was at Road Atlanta (in the Can-Am Championship) when I was about 2.5 seconds quicker than Denny (Hulme) for pole position. Then I drove it at Laguna Seca and again at Riverside.

"Do you remember the old Riverside turn 9? It was a long, long, long fast 180-degree right-hander just before the pits. During practice I came up behind Denny (in the McLaren M8D-Chevrolet) on the way into that corner and it was a very fast corner. Not quite flat but for me very close to it, and I remember driving around the outside of Denny (laughing) and he just pulled off into the pit lane absolutely pissed off! He took his helmet off and sat on the pit wall and sulked for the rest of the practice session. I had beaten his time by about 2.5 seconds. It was a wonderful car to drive!"